Journal of Education and Work ( IF 1.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-22 , DOI: 10.1080/13639080.2020.1755428 Geoff Mason 1, 2
ABSTRACT
This paper reviews evidence on two serious imbalances in the UK education and training system:
-
The heavy bias in public spending on initial education and training (for 18–24-year olds) towards higher education at the expense of further education and vocational education and training.
-
The very weak government support for continuing education and training (for adults aged 25-plus) compared to that provided for initial education and training for new entrants to the workforce.
The effects of these imbalances are compounded by a marked reluctance by many employers to invest in work-based training, especially long-duration apprenticeship training.
In a concluding policy section, the paper discusses ways in which both major imbalances could be reduced by abolishing tuition fees: first, for all Further Education courses up to Level 5 (for example, Foundation degrees, Higher National Diplomas); and second, for work-related, community learning and general-interest courses which do not necessarily lead to formal qualifications.
It also considers options for short-duration continuing education and training for adults of all ages to be encouraged without undermining current efforts to reform and improve apprenticeship training
中文翻译:
高等教育,初级职业教育和培训以及继续教育和培训:平衡应在哪里?
摘要
本文回顾了英国教育和培训系统中两个严重失衡的证据:
-
公共支出在初等教育和培训(18-24岁年龄段)上的偏重于高等教育,却以继续教育和职业教育与培训为代价。
-
与为新进入劳动力市场的初次教育和培训相比,政府对继续教育和培训(25岁以上成年人)的支持非常薄弱。
许多雇主明显不愿投资于以工作为基础的培训,特别是长期的学徒培训,加剧了这些失衡的影响。
在最后的政策部分中,本文讨论了通过取消学费可以减少这两种主要失衡的方式:首先,所有不超过5级的继续教育课程(例如,基础学位,高级国家文凭);第二,针对与工作相关的社区学习和一般兴趣课程,这些课程不一定会获得正式资格。
它还认为,在不损害当前改革和改进学徒培训的努力的情况下,应鼓励对各个年龄段的成年人进行短期继续教育和培训的选择。