ABSTRACT

Humanitarian intervention has undergone several changes since the Second World War and the justifications behind it are continually expanding and being reshaped as a result of the interventions performed to resolve the conflicts in Somalia, Bosnia, Rwanda, Sudan and Kosovo, as well as a result of the emerging post-9/11 paradigm. Humanitarian intervention, while open to many different definitions, is generally understood as the use of both hard and soft power across state borders by external forces with the goal of preventing or obstructing gross human rights violations without the permission of the state within whose territory force is utilised. Overall, this paper is an investigation into the topic of humanitarian intervention. However, it is primarily an investigation into the most recent manifestation of humanitarian intervention, the responsibility to protect and its failures, in sovereignty, morality, and legality in the context of the United Nations as the ‘Guardian Angel of Global Security’.

摘要

自第二次世界大战以来，人道主义干预经历了几项变化，其后的理由由于解决索马里，波斯尼亚，卢旺达，苏丹和科索沃的冲突而采取的干预措施以及新兴的9/11后范式。人道主义干预虽然有许多不同的定义，但通常被理解为外来势力在国家边界上同时使用硬实力和软实力，目的是防止或阻止严重侵犯人权的行为，而无需得到其领土内力量所在国家的许可。被利用。总体而言，本文是对人道主义干预主题的调查。但是，这主要是对人道主义干预的最新表现的调查，