书评：Everett Mendelsohn、Merritt Roe Smith 和 Peter Weingart（编辑）：科学、技术和军事。克鲁沃学术出版社。多德雷赫特/波士顿/伦敦 1988 年，第一卷。I，第 1-288 页和 II，第 291-562 页,Acta Sociologica

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Acta Sociologica › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

书评：Everett Mendelsohn、Merritt Roe Smith 和 Peter Weingart（编辑）：科学、技术和军事。克鲁沃学术出版社。多德雷赫特/波士顿/伦敦 1988 年，第一卷。I，第 1-288 页和 II，第 291-562 页
Acta Sociologica ( IF 2.355 ) Pub Date : 1990-07-01 , DOI: 10.1177/000169939003300309
Henning Sørensen ₁

Affiliation

肯定是误导。当一些作者归纳性地试图将他们的描述扩展到整个科学界时，这本书的任何批评都在这里。在他们的引言“科学与军事：问题的设定”中，三位编辑将所有文章演绎地归纳为一个结论。他们以“工业-军事综合体对国家政策的不当影响”为出发点。这个表达是由已故总统艾森豪威尔在他的告别演说中提出的。但“工业-军事复合体”的概念和现实颇有争议。(Sam C. Sarkesian [ed.]: The N9rlrtarv-Industrrn! Complex: A Reassessmeflt. London/Beverly Hills 1972: Sage)。而文章本身也存在分歧，不仅仅是“复合体”的存在，还有谁在影响谁。对使用“复合体”或“科学家”或“军队”一词持怀疑态度的一个原因是，作者必须将这些参与者视为定义明确且连贯的群体，而他们并非如此。他们合作以及

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Book Reviews : Everett Mendelsohn, Merritt Roe Smith & Peter Weingart (eds.): Science, Tech nology and the Military,. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht/Boston/London 1988, vol. I, pp. 1-288 and II, pp. 291-562

certainly be misleading. It is exactly here that any cnticism of the book lies, when some of the authors inductively try to expand their description to the whole scientific community. In their introduction, ’Science and the Military: Setting of the Problem’, the three editors deductively encompass all the articles m one conclusion. They take as a starting-point the ’undue influence on national policy from the Industrial-Military Complex’. This expression was formulated by the late President Eisenhower in his Farewell Address. But the concept and the reality of the ’Industrial-Military Complex’ is rather debatable. (Sam C. Sarkesian [ed.]: The N9rlrtarv-Industrrn! Complex: A Reassessmeflt. London/Beverly Hills 1972: Sage). And the articles themselves are in mutual disagreement, not just with the existence of ’the Complex’, but also with who is influencing whom. One reason for the scepticism against the use of the term ’the Complex’ or ’the Scientists’ or ’the Military’ is that the authors then have to perceive these actors as well-defined and coherent groups, which they are not. They cooperate as well as

更新日期：1990-07-01

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊最新论文

全部期刊列表>>