I want to thank my interlocutors Kate Coddington, Maribel Casas-Cortes, Anne McNevin and Stephan Scheel for their generous comments and for their attentive reading of The Making of Migration. Their critical insights and questions touch upon the main epistemic and political stakes that the book grapple with. Their suggestions, questions and remarks are an incitement to push forward some research pathways that The Making of Migration only partially addresses, and to open up new avenues. Maribel Casas-Cortes has nicely captured the main stake of the book speaking about the ‘amplification and problematizing of migration as a potential condition and struggle of and for anyone under any induced vulnerability’. I engage here with the comments that my interlocutors raised by focusing my response along three conceptual threads: choked subjects; genealogy of struggles; migrants’ irreducibility to population.

中文翻译：

---

挖掘斗争和移民暴民的家谱

我要感谢我的对话者凯特·科丁顿（Kate Coddington），玛丽贝尔·卡萨斯·科尔特斯（Maribel Casas-Cortes），安妮·麦克尼文（Anne McNevin）和斯蒂芬·舍尔（Stephan Scheel）的慷慨评论，以及他们对《移民的形成》的专心阅读。他们的批判性见解和问题触及了本书所涉及的主要认知和政治问题。他们的建议，问题和言论是对推进《迁移的形成》仅部分解决的一些研究途径的煽动，并开辟了新的途径。Maribel Casas-Cortes很好地抓住了这本书的主要内容，该书谈到了“移民的扩大化和问题化，这是潜在的条件和为之而斗争”。处于任何诱发脆弱性之下的任何人”。我在这里与我的对话者通过将我的回答集中在三个概念性线程上而提出的意见联系在一起：斗争的家谱；移民对人口的不可约。