ABSTRACT The primary goal of the present paper is to analyse and compare the criteria on the conditions and requirements for academic promotion in three countries: Serbia, Slovenia and Montenegro. The University of Novi Sad, the University of Ljubljana, and the University of Montenegro were selected to be subjects in this study. The sources used for the analyses in this study were the official criteria on the condition and requirements for academic promotion at the abovementioned universities. The authors used a descriptive method with the consulting of competent sources and personal experiences. First, it is interesting to note that the universities in Serbia and Slovenia follow official documents at two levels: one at the national level issued by the relevant higher education council/agency and the second at the university level issued by the senate of each university, whose criteria are more strict in terms of quantitative requirements. However, this is not the case in Montenegro, where universities follow only the national criteria in the research quality evaluation. In each country, evaluation exercises usually recognize three fields, one of which is social sciences and humanities, which is concerned with an entire range of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary scientific areas. Comparing the minimum standards for the appointment of university teachers, it is essential to highlight that Slovenian regulations are the most demanding, especially with regards to quantitative criteria, while Serbian and Montenegrin criteria are similar to each other; however, it is necessary to highlight that Montenegrin regulations contain some unusual criteria, such as the requirement that scientific research work must be achieved through one single-author paper published in an international journal for promotion to academic titles at all three levels (assistant, associate and full professor) in social sciences and humanities; however, this is not the case in other academic fields.

中文翻译：

---

社会科学领域的研究质量评估：以塞尔维亚，斯洛文尼亚和黑山为学术促进条件和标准的案例

摘要本文的主要目标是分析和比较三个国家（塞尔维亚，斯洛文尼亚和黑山）的学术晋升条件和要求标准。本研究选择了诺维萨德大学，卢布尔雅那大学和黑山大学作为研究对象。本研究中用于分析的资料来源是上述大学的学术晋升条件和要求的官方标准。作者使用了描述性方法，并参考了有力的资料和个人经验。首先，有趣的是，塞尔维亚和斯洛文尼亚的大学遵循两个级别的官方文件：一个是由相关的高等教育理事会/机构在国家一级发布的，第二个是由每所大学的参议院发布的，在大学级别上的，其标准在数量要求方面更为严格。但是，黑山情况并非如此，黑山大学在研究质量评估中仅遵循国家标准。在每个国家，评估活动通常会识别三个领域，其中一个是社会科学和人文学科，它涉及整个跨学科和多学科科学领域。比较大学教师任命的最低标准，必须强调斯洛文尼亚的法规要求最高，尤其是在定量标准方面，而塞尔维亚和黑山的标准彼此相似；但是，必须强调的是，黑山法规包含一些不寻常的标准，例如要求必须通过在国际期刊上发表的一篇论文的单作者论文来完成科学研究工作，以提升所有三个级别的学术职称（助理，副教授）。以及社会科学和人文学科的教授）；但是，在其他学术领域却不是这样。