The aim of this work is to provide a descriptive analysis of the mobbing phenomenon found in a sampling of Italian civil court judgments in the last fifteen years. The analysis was conducted according to the behaviors that characterize the mobbing, the type of workplace, the power differential between perpetrator and victim, the victim’s and the perpetrator’s typologies, the motives, and the consequences for the victim. Data were gathered from two free websites on civil judgments involving mobbing. An analysis of the 73 civil judgments showed 34 male victims (46.6%) and 39 female victims (53.4%) of mobbing. In 68 (93.2%) cases, the behavior that characterized the mobbing campaign was an attack on personal and professional life. Female victims of mobbing in particular indicated isolation and attack on reputation. About half of the sample worked in a private company, 16 (21.9%) in public administration, 11 (15.1%) in the educational sector, and nine (12.3%) in the health sector. The time from the beginning of the mobbing campaign to when it was reported was higher among men than women. Moreover, female victims are more prone than male victims to report suffering from an anxiety disorder as a consequence of mobbing, and they perceive the mobbing behavior to be caused by the perpetrator’s personal characteristics. Men, on the other hand, more often than women consider the abusive acts casual and more frequently believe they are the “chosen victim” because of perceived personal weaknesses.

中文翻译：

---

民事法院关于围攻的判决中描述的受害者经历：性别差异

这项工作的目的是对过去15年间意大利民事法院判决样本中发现的围攻现象进行描述性分析。分析是根据表征围攻的行为，工作场所的类型，施暴者与受害者之间的权力差异，受害者和施暴者的类型，动机以及对受害者的后果而进行的。数据是从两个免费网站收集的，涉及涉及围攻的民事判决。对73项民事判决的分析显示，有34名男性受害者（占46.6％）和39名女性受害者（占53.4％）。在68（93.2％）个案例中，围攻行动的特征是对个人和职业生活的攻击。围攻的女性受害者尤其表示孤立和对名誉的攻击。大约一半的样本在私营公司工作，公共行政部门有16名（21.9％），教育部门有11名（15.1％），卫生部门有9名（12.3％）。从围攻运动开始到据报道的时间，男性比女性高。此外，女性受害者比男性受害者更容易报告由于围攻而导致的焦虑症，她们认为围攻行为是由犯罪者的个人特征引起的。另一方面，男性比女性更经常认为滥用行为是偶然的，并且更经常地认为由于个人的弱点，他们是“被选择的受害者”。从围攻运动开始到据报道的时间，男性比女性高。此外，女性受害者比男性受害者更容易报告由于围攻而导致的焦虑症，她们认为围攻行为是由犯罪者的个人特征引起的。另一方面，男性比女性更经常认为滥用行为是偶然的，并且更经常地认为由于个人的弱点，他们是“被选择的受害者”。从围攻运动开始到据报道的时间，男性比女性高。此外，女性受害者比男性受害者更容易报告由于围攻而导致的焦虑症，她们认为围攻行为是由犯罪者的个人特征造成的。另一方面，男性比女性更经常认为滥用行为是偶然的，并且更经常地认为由于个人的弱点，他们是“被选择的受害者”。