Communication Studies scholars tend to be dialogical-dialectical and so are generally able to productively talk across multiple traditions of inquiry. As I argue in this paper, a study of justice requires this type of approach. After discussing classical notions of dialogical argumentation, the critique of rhetoric, and their modern counterparts, I identify several key elements of dialogical-dialectical reasoning. I then demonstrate how this kind of approach emphasize consideration, deliberation, assertion, the giving and taking of reason, concern with the nature of reasoning, and points to the ethical evaluation of political practices.

中文翻译：

---

传播学，规范正义与混合探究传统

传播研究学者倾向于对话对话，因此通常能够跨多种探究传统进行富有成效的对话。正如我在本文中所论证的那样，对正义的研究需要这种方法。在讨论了对话辩证法的经典概念，修辞批评及其现代对应物之后，我确定了对话辩证推理的几个关键要素。然后，我将说明这种方法如何强调思考，思考，主张，理性的给予和接受，对推理本质的关注，并指出对政治实践的伦理评价。