The notion of performance has become dominant in health programming, whether being embodied through pay-for-performance schemes or through other incentive-based interventions. In this article, we seek to unpack the idea of performance and performing in a dialogical fashion between field-based evaluation findings and methodological considerations. We draw on episodes where methodological reflections on performing ethnography in the field of global health intersect with findings from the everyday practices of working under performance-based contracts in the Senegalese supply chain for family planning. While process evaluations can be used to understand contextual factors influencing the implementation of an intervention, we as anthropologists in and of contemporary global health have an imperative to explore and challenge categories of knowledge and practice. Making room for new spaces of possibilities to emerge means locating anthropology within qualitative global health research.

中文翻译：

---

设想，评估和共同制定全球卫生干预措施的绩效

绩效概念已在卫生规划中占主导地位，无论是通过按绩效付费计划还是通过其他基于激励的干预措施来体现。在本文中，我们力求通过基于实地的评估结果与方法学考虑因素之间的对话方式来解开绩效和绩效的概念。我们借鉴了一些事件，其中关于全球卫生领域中人种志研究的方法论思考与塞内加尔计划生育供应链中基于绩效合同的日常工作的发现相交。虽然可以使用过程评估来了解影响干预措施实施的背景因素，作为当代全球健康的人类学家，我们必须探索和挑战各种知识和实践。为可能出现的新空间腾出空间，意味着将人类学置于定性的全球健康研究之内。