As science communication programs grow worldwide, effective evaluation and assessment metrics lag. While there is no consensus on evaluation protocols specifically for science communication training, there is agreement on elements of effective training: listening, empathy, and knowing your audience — core tenets of improvisation. We designed an evaluation protocol, tested over three years, based on validated and newly developed scales for an improvisation-based communication training at the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science. Initial results suggest that ‘knowing your audience’ should apply to training providers as they design and evaluate their curriculum, and gender may be a key influence on outcomes. Abstract

中文翻译：

---

一种尺寸并不能完全适合：性别对成果设计，科学传播计划的评估和评估的影响

随着全球科学传播计划的发展，有效的评估和评估指标将滞后。虽然在专门针对科学交流培训的评估协议上尚未达成共识，但在有效培训的要素上却达成了共识：倾听，同理心和了解您的听众-即兴创作的核心宗旨。我们基于经过验证和最新开发的量表，设计了一项经过三年测试的评估协议，用于在Alan Alda传播科学中心进行即兴创作的交流培训。初步结果表明，“了解您的听众”应适用于培训提供者设计和评估课程的过程，而性别可能是对结果的关键影响。抽象