Can we really say what type of story has impact on us, and what type of story does not? Evidence suggests that we can. But we need to better understand the way that stories work on us, at a neural and empathetic level, and better understand the ways that the elements of stories, such as structure and metaphor work. By combining scientific research with the deeper wisdom of traditional storytelling we have both a deep knowledge married to scientific evidence — which can be very powerful tools for science communicators. Abstract

中文翻译：

---

谁不喜欢一个好故事？-神经科学讲述我们如何回应叙事

我们真的可以说什么类型的故事对我们有影响，什么类型的故事没有影响？有证据表明我们可以做到。但是，我们需要在神经和同理心层次上更好地理解故事在我们身上的工作方式，并更好地理解故事元素（例如结构和隐喻）的工作方式。通过将科学研究与传统讲故事的深厚智慧相结合，我们既拥有与科学证据相结合的丰富知识，又可以成为科学传播者的强大工具。抽象