Background. There is little evidence to support the comprehensiveness of FMS in sports populations to predict injuries. Ignoring rapid decelerations and high eccentric forces which may be characteristics of high risk for injury are evident in these tests. With this in mind, it seems logical to use tests to assess the performance of athletes so as to evaluate speed components as well as to identify the potential risk factors for injury. This can be a good complement to FMS. Objectives. This study aimed to identify functional movement screening tests to predict injuries in volleyball. Methods. In this descriptive study, 20 high-level experts in volleyball were selected through purposive sampling. The data were collected in 2017 through semi-structured interviews and field notes. The interview transcripts were encoded using MAXQDA10 software®. To extract the categories and subjects, the thematic analysis approach was used. Results. In the first analysis process, the initial codes were extracted and finally, 38 of the 82 existing potential tests were identified. Then, after various stages of determining the validity and reliability of 12 tests—deep squat, inline lunge, trunk stability push up, rotary stability, shoulder mobility, triple hop for distance, hexagon, lateral lunge, triple jump for distance, sidearm medicine ball throw, closed kinetic chain upper extremity and squat jump—were identified for inclusion in this tool. Conclusions. Based on the results of the interviews, it could be concluded that the interviewees’ choices were based more on the tests’ similarity with the type of movement patterns and performance capabilities in volleyball and considering the anatomical areas prone to injury as well.

中文翻译：

---

功能运动筛查测试对排球运动损伤的预测：定性研究

背景。几乎没有证据支持FMS在运动人群中预测伤害的全面性。在这些测试中，可以忽略快速减速和高偏心力（这些高偏心力可能会带来很高的伤害风险）。考虑到这一点，使用测试来评估运动员的表现以评估速度成分以及确定潜在的伤害危险因素似乎是合乎逻辑的。这可以很好地补充FMS。目标。这项研究旨在确定功能运动筛查测试，以预测排球的受伤情况。方法。在这项描述性研究中，通过有目的抽样选择了20名排球高级专家。数据是2017年通过半结构化访谈和现场记录收集的。采访笔录使用MAXQDA10软件编码。为了提取类别和主题，使用了主题分析方法。结果。在第一个分析过程中，提取了初始代码，最后，在82个现有潜在测试中确定了38个。然后，在确定了12个测试的有效性和可靠性的各个阶段之后-深蹲，内弓步，躯干稳定性提升，旋转稳定性，肩膀移动性，距离三跳，六边形，侧弓步，距离三跳，侧臂药球投掷，闭合的动力学链上肢和下蹲跳被确定为包含在此工具中。结论。根据采访结果，