Along with the Nuremberg Trial adjudicating Nazi German crimes, the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE, hereafter Tokyo Trial) marked a significant historical event that shaped our understanding of World War II. The Tokyo Trial defined Japan‟s Manchurian Incident of 1931 and subsequent imperial expansion as “wars of aggression.” Some in Japan reject this view. Those who deny Japan‟s “war responsibility” (sensō sekinin) reject the characterization of an “aggressive war” by labelling it as the so-called “Tokyo Trial view of history.” They also criticize the Tokyo Trial as “victor‟s justice.” However, such critiques of the Tokyo Trial and the “Tokyo Trial view of history” neglect a different problem underlying the history of the Tokyo Trial. During the tribunal, the question of Japanese colonial rule was barely discussed in the pursuit of Japan‟s responsibility for aggression. In other words, the Tokyo Trial

中文翻译：

---

东京审判和殖民责任问题：在日韩国对被占领日本联合司法的反应*

随着纽伦堡审判审判纳粹德国的罪行，远东国际军事法庭（IMTFE，以下简称东京审判）标志着一个重要的历史事件，它塑造了我们对第二次世界大战的理解。东京审判将 1931 年日本满洲事变和随后的帝国扩张定义为“侵略战争”。日本有些人反对这种观点。否认日本“战争责任”（sensō sekinin）的人拒绝将“侵略战争”定性为所谓的“东京审判历史观”。他们还批评东京审判是“胜利者的正义”。然而，这种对东京审判和“东京审判历史观”的批判忽视了东京审判历史背后的另一个问题。庭审期间，在追究日本的侵略责任时，几乎没有讨论日本的殖民统治问题。换言之，东京审判