This paper aims to analyse the Sharīʿah premises of waqf (Islamic trust), followed by dilating on the nature of argumentation among the classical jurists on its rules and principles. The paper critically analyses the edifice of the applied juristic analogy of different early jurists in deriving various waqf doctrines. The objective of analysing the jurisprudential framework of waqf in its classical mould is to conceptualise the methods, mechanism and nature of juristic analogies in deriving the waqf principles. This analysis is critical to understand the scope of jurisprudential flexibility in modern awqaf.,The paper is an outcome of a library-based research. It uses the classical jurisprudential treatises of waqf with an aim to analyse the Sharīʿah basis of the institution, the premises of its key principles and the applied juristic analogy to derive the same. The paper covers the classical waqf books and treatises from the four Sunni schools of jurisprudence and uses a textual analysis method.,The paper finds that in its initial phase, the conceptual framework of waqf was not unanimously agreed by all jurists, rather its Sharīʿah permissibility remained critically disputed among them for a while. Though, the opinion of those jurists who approved the Sharīʿah-validity of waqf was to prevail in the later stage, disagreement persisted with reference to its necessary features and defining criteria. It is found that in the classical waqf literature, two most disputed aspects of waqf jurisprudence constituted the requirements for completion of a waqf and its ownership status.,This study does neither cover the historical contribution of waqf among the Muslim societies nor does it touch on the empirical aspects of modern waqf. Rather, the focus of the study is limited to analysing the classical jurisprudential discourse of waqf and distillation process of its rulings.,The objective of analysing the classical juristic discourse of waqf is to underline the premises of classical juristic analogy in determining the framework of fiqh al-awqāf in its classical permutations and to learn how to adopt a similar approach for deduction of new waqf rulings.,This paper adds original value to the body of waqf literature for analysing the classical waqf rulings distillation process along with examining the methods and mechanism of juristic analogy.

中文翻译：

---

古典宗教习俗，法律比喻和宗教习俗的框架。

本文旨在分析waqf（伊斯兰信任）的Sharīʿah前提，然后对古典法学家关于其规则和原则的论证性质进行扩张。论文批判性地分析了不同早期法学家在适用各种法律规则时所采用的法律类比的建构。在经典模型中分析waqf的法学框架的目的是概念化推导waqf原理的法律类比的方法，机制和性质。该分析对于理解现代awqaf的法学灵活性的范围至关重要。本文是基于图书馆的研究的成果。它使用waqf的经典法学论文，目的是分析该机构的Sharīʿah基础，其关键原则的前提和适用的法律类比推论相同。本文涵盖了四个逊尼派法学流派的经典waqf书籍和论文，并使用了文本分析方法。论文发现，在最初阶段，waqf的概念框架并未得到所有法学家的一致认可，而是其伊斯兰教法允许的他们之间仍然存在严重的争议。尽管那些批准waqf的伊斯兰教法合法性的法学家的意见将在后期盛行，但在提及其必要特征和定义标准方面仍存在分歧。发现在古典waqf文献中，waqf法学最有争议的两个方面构成了waqf的完成及其所有权状态的要求。这项研究既没有涵盖穆斯林社会中穆斯林宗教信仰组织的历史贡献，也没有涉及现代穆斯林宗教信仰组织的经验方面。相反，本研究的重点仅限于分析waqf的经典法学话语及其裁定的提炼过程。分析waqf的经典法学话语的目的是强调确定法制框架时的经典法律类比前提。 al-awqāf的经典排列，并学习如何采用类似的方法来推导新的waqf裁定。本文为waqf文献提供了原始价值，用于分析经典waqf裁定蒸馏过程，并研究了方法和机理。法律类比。