This article highlights the application of the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) I and II in selecting the best laptop model among six different available models in the market. Seven important criteria, that is, processor, hard disk capacity, operating system, RAM, screen size, brand, and color, are selected, based on which the selection process have been made. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted for calculating the weightages of the seven criteria and PROMETHEE is applied to select the best alternative. PROMETHEE I provides the partial ranking and preferences of one model over another, whereas PROMETHEE II provides the complete ranking of the alternatives. From this analysis, Model 4 is coming out to be the best laptop model occupying the first position and Model 1 occupies the last position, thus indicating it as the worst model among the group. The objectives of this article are to select the best laptop model among six available alternatives and to understood the steps of both multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies, that is, PROMETHEE and AHP, in details.

中文翻译：

---

排名方法：Promethee I和Promethee II

本文重点介绍了“优先选择评估组织排名方法”（PROMETHEE）I和II在市场上六种不同可用型号中选择最佳笔记本电脑型号时的应用。选择了七个重要标准，即处理器，硬盘容量，操作系统，RAM，屏幕尺寸，品牌和颜色，并以此为基础进行选择。采用层次分析法（AHP）来计算这七个标准的权重，并使用PROMETHEE选择最佳替代方法。PROMETHEE I提供了一种模型相对于另一种模型的部分排名和偏好，而PROMETHEE II提供了替代模型的完整排名。通过此分析，Model 4成为占据第一位置的最佳笔记本电脑型号，而Model 1占据最后位置，因此表明它是该组中最差的模型。本文的目的是在六个可用的替代方案中选择最佳的笔记本电脑型号，并详细了解多标准决策（MCDM）方法的两个步骤，即PROMETHEE和AHP。