Scholars inside and outside Europe have recently argued that product liability law should recognise the sheer complexity of designing an adequate warning. In the US, for instance, it has been suggested that a plaintiff bringing a claim based on a defective warning should be required to prove which reasonable alternative warning would have prevented her from suffering harm. While much can be said in favour of a more refined approach to product warnings, these proposals are incompatible with many key characteristics of positive European product liability law as construed by the Court of Justice of the European Union. These scholars' recommendations invite us to reconsider some of the features of European product liability law and decide upon a direction for the future.

中文翻译：

---

现代产品警告理论与欧洲产品责任法

欧洲内外的学者最近都争辩说，产品责任法应该承认设计适当警告的绝对复杂性。例如，在美国，有人建议应要求原告基于有缺陷的警告提出索赔，以证明哪种合理的替代警告会阻止她遭受伤害。虽然可以说很多赞成采用更精致的产品警告方法，但是这些提议与欧盟法院解释的积极的欧洲产品责任法的许多关键特征不符。这些学者的建议邀请我们重新考虑欧洲产品责任法的某些特征，并确定未来的方向。