In approximately 108 judgments, the Belgian Constitutional Court has confirmed the presence of a legislative lacuna. These judgements incite a constitutional dialogue, first and foremost with the legislator, especially in those cases where the Court explicitly emphasizes that only the legislator can amend an unconstitutional lack of legislation. Although the case law of the Constitutional Court regarding these legislative omissions has already been largely explored, the actual legislative reaction has not received much attention. Consequently, in this contribution the legislative response to these ‘lacuna judgements’ is examined. The study by Meuwese and Snel regarding the concept of constitutional dialogue offers an excellent starting point to analyse the interaction between the Constitutional Court and the legislator. The lack of any regular or systematic follow-up or specific parliamentary proceeding to comply with the case law of the Constitutional Court, however, has complicated the collection of empirical data.

中文翻译：

---

立法不作为案中的宪法对话：谁填补了立法空白？

比利时宪法法院在大约108项判决中确认存在立法缺陷。这些判决首先引起了与立法者的宪法对话，尤其是在法院明确强调只有立法者可以修改违宪的立法的情况下。尽管宪法法院关于这些立法遗漏的判例法已经得到了很大的探讨，但实际的立法反应并未引起人们的广泛关注。因此，在这项贡献中，考察了对这些“空白判断”的立法回应。Meuwese和Snel关于宪法对话概念的研究为分析宪法法院与立法者之间的互动提供了一个很好的起点。