One of the main criticisms directed against the legitimacy of internationally recognized human rights is that they are ethnocentric or parochial. The examination of this objection leads to the conclusion that it is not relativism but cultural-ethical pluralism the main challenge to the universal validity of human rights. Ethical pluralism queries that the justification of human rights that has prevailed since the approval of the UDHR has arbitrarily given, under a deceptive appearance of universality, a weight far superior to individualistic values than to collectivistic. After examining some of the main attempts to overcome this challenge (the constructive theory of human rights and justificatory minimalism), the one based on the defense of a kind of ethical individualism compatible with a moderate ethical objectivism is defended as a preferable alternative.

中文翻译：

---

伦理文化多元主义对人权普遍性的挑战

针对国际公认的人权合法性的主要批评之一是，它们以民族为中心或狭och的。对这一异议的考察得出的结论是，它不是相对主义而是文化伦理多元主义，这是对人权普遍适用性的主要挑战。伦理多元主义质疑，自《世界人权宣言》获得批准以来，普遍存在的人权辩护在一种具有普遍性的欺骗性表象下被任意赋予，其权重远高于个人主义价值观而不是集体主义价值观。在研究了克服这一挑战的一些主要尝试（建设性的人权理论和合理的极简主义）之后，