This article asks about the current modes of production in human rights research and how they are (or may be) determined by the structures where that knowledge is generated. These questions will be answered by looking at the results of a preliminary study on the reception and subsequent institutionalisation of studies on human rights in stable structures that are dedicated to their research, training and dissemination in Spanish universities. The starting hypothesis is that this institutionalisation causes conceptual, epistemological and methodological biases in the rationales for knowledge construction in the field of human rights that determine and hinder the interdisciplinary approach demanded by its study. Interdisciplinarity has become a dominant aspect of human rights research. The question about how this feature is articulated and who articulates it in the academic institutional framework is pertinent in a field of knowledge that cannot avoid asymmetries in the production and circulation of knowledge. The results show that human rights research has been mainly institutionalised in stable university structures in Spain within the field of legal sciences, with a clear predominance of the area of the Philosophy of Law. It can be concluded that this has been conditioned by the reception and subsequent development of the study of human rights in Spain. While it has been found that the line developed by these centres and research groups has been consolidated and recognised, it can also be confirmed that their modes of knowledge production do not match the rationale of interdisciplinary research. These limitations are not just endogenous. There are some features of Spanish institutional R&D&i culture that make interdisciplinary research on human rights difficult.

中文翻译：

---

人权研究中的知识生产方法：促进跨学科方法的制约因素和机遇

本文询问人权研究的当前生产方式，以及这些方式如何（或可能）由产生知识的结构来决定。这些问题将通过在一个稳定的结构中致力于人权研究的接受和随后制度化的初步研究的结果来回答，该稳定结构致力于西班牙大学的研究，培训和传播。最初的假设是，这种制度化导致人权领域知识建设的理论上的观念，认识论和方法论上的偏见，这些偏见决定并阻碍了其研究所要求的跨学科方法。跨学科性已成为人权研究的主要方面。关于这一特征如何表达以及在学术制度框架中由谁进行表达的问题与知识领域有关，该领域无法避免知识生产和流通中的不对称性。结果表明，人权研究主要是在西班牙法学领域稳定的大学结构中制度化的，在法哲学领域具有明显的优势。可以得出结论，这取决于西班牙对人权研究的接受和随后的发展。虽然已经发现这些中心和研究小组开发的路线已得到巩固和认可，但也可以证实他们的知识生产方式与跨学科研究的原理不符。这些限制不仅是内在的。西班牙机构研发文化的某些特征使对人权的跨学科研究变得困难。