Thick concepts have been central in metaethical debates over the last few decades, for instance in the controversy between cognitivism and non-cognitisivism or in the fact/value distinction. They are characterised as world guided, action guiding and community shared. In this paper, thick concepts are used to analyse case law on blasphemy from the European Court of Human Rights. When conducting this analysis, the test of civility proposed by Habermas and Rawls will also be applied. Public reason obligates the use of reasons accessible to all, that is to say not with a particular/thick meaning, in the public sphere.

中文翻译：

---

亵渎为厚重的观念

在过去的几十年中，厚泛的概念一直在元伦理学辩论中处于中心地位，例如在认知主义与非认知主义之间的争论或事实/价值区分中。它们的特点是世界指导，行动指导和社区共享。在本文中，使用了粗略的概念来分析欧洲人权法院关于亵渎罪的判例法。在进行此分析时，还将应用哈贝马斯和罗尔斯提出的文明测试。在公共领域，公共理性有义务使用所有人都可以使用的原因，也就是说没有特定/浓厚的含义。