In this paper we investigate how the model of deliberation proposed by Isabela and Norman Fairclough can be used for a better clarification and understanding of the framing processes in media – especially in opinion articles. We thus aim at integrating theoretical contributions from critical discourse analysis and argumentation theory with standard approaches to framing, originating in media studies. We emphasize how a rhetorical approach to framing can provide analytical insights into framing processes and complement the typical quantitative approaches with qualitative analysis based on textual reconstruction. Starting from an issue-specific approach to framing, we discuss a particular case of framing of intra-EU migration, analyzing four opinion articles selected from a larger corpus of Romanian, British and French media. We highlight, along our analysis, various methodological options and analytical difficulties inherent to such an approach.

中文翻译：

---

关于欧盟内部迁移的媒体审议。基于修辞分析的定性框架

在本文中，我们研究了伊莎贝拉（Isabela）和诺曼·费尔克洛夫（Norman Fairclough）提出的审议模型如何用于更好地阐明和理解媒体（尤其是舆论文章）的成帧过程。因此，我们旨在将批判性话语分析和论证理论的理论贡献与源自媒体研究的标准构架方法相结合。我们强调框架的修辞方法如何提供对框架过程的分析见解，并以基于文本重构的定性分析来补充典型的定量方法。从针对特定问题的框架开始，我们讨论了欧盟内部移民框架的一个特殊案例，分析了从罗马尼亚，英国和法国媒体的较大语料库中选出的四篇观点文章。我们强调