This article is partly based on a preparative article for the European Citizens Conference at the Romanian National University of Political Studies and Administration and some notes for the keynote speech, Bucharest, November 5, 2013. It contains an epistemological (concept formation) and methodological (operationalisation) approach to the construct of European Citizenship. In the epistemological part occurs a confrontation between the socio-legal conceptual development of the idea of national citizenship (400 BC – 1945 AD) and the politico-legal construction of the idea of European Citizenship after 1945 until the present day. The latter gives rise to a bifurcation of the European part (the space) and the devalued local part (the place), where national citizenship comes in between, such that we deal with a tripartite citizenship construct. The confrontation between these three forms is shown particularly in EU communication efforts through PR. and PD. which result in a gradual crystallization of the trend in public opinion on the citizenship idea. The epistemological developments should have an effect on the methodology of measurement, for which some indices are constructed as example. These indices form a critical counterpoint against the measurement devices in the Eurobarometers that do not reckon with other relevant disciplines besides social-psychology.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲公民身份：构造的概念化和背景化

本文部分基于罗马尼亚国家政治研究与行政大学欧洲公民大会的准备文章，以及主题演讲布加勒斯特（2013年11月5日）的一些注释。其中包含认识论（概念形成）和方法论（运营化）方法来构建欧洲公民身份。在认识论部分，发生了公民身份概念的社会法律概念发展（公元前400年至公元1945年）与欧洲公民身份概念的政治法律结构之间的对抗。后者引起了欧洲部分（空间）和贬值的本地部分（地方）之间的分歧，在这部分之间存在国家公民身份，因此我们要处理三方公民身份结构。这三种形式之间的对抗尤其体现在欧盟通过PR进行的交流努力中。和PD。这导致了公众舆论对公民理念趋势的逐渐结晶。认识论的发展应该对测量方法产生影响，为此建立了一些指标作为例子。这些指数与欧洲晴雨表中的测量设备形成了严重的对立，除了社会心理学之外，这些测量设备无法与其他相关学科相提并论。以一些索引为例。这些指数与欧洲晴雨表中的测量设备形成了严重的对立，除了社会心理学之外，这些测量设备无法与其他相关学科相提并论。以一些索引为例。这些指数与欧洲晴雨表中的测量设备形成了严重的对立，除了社会心理学之外，这些测量设备无法与其他相关学科相提并论。