The accuracy and relevance of United States print news media has been called into question at increasing rates in the post-truth era. Conservatives, in particular, have long expressed concerns that mass and digital media censor conservative as well as Christian viewpoints while promoting a progressive and, more recently, pro-Muslim, platform. They have increasingly turned to alternative-right and alternative right-wing sources for news and discussion within what they deem to be unfiltered and unbiased networks. This article employs a mixed method approach of content and discourse analysis of sources from 1 January to 15 May of 2019 pertaining to discourse concerning the relationship between Christianity and Islam within and in response to articles in three such sources: Breitbart, The Federalist, and FrontPage Magazine. The role of these three websites is considered in the radicalization of those who aim to defend a monolithic form of Christianity rather than a particular Christian denomination or belief.

中文翻译：

---

反动新闻中的伊斯兰恐惧症：美国激进的基督教

在后真相时代，美国印刷新闻媒体的准确性和相关性受到越来越多的质疑。尤其是，保守派长期以来一直对大众和数字媒体的审查制度持保守态度，并关注基督教的观点，同时又提倡进步的，最近支持亲穆斯林的平台。他们越来越多地选择右派和右派的消息来源，在他们认为未经过滤和公正的网络内进行新闻和讨论。本文采用混合方法，对2019年1月1日至5月15日期间与基督教和伊斯兰教之间的关系有关的话语进行了内容和话语分析，并对以下三个来源的文章进行了回应：布雷特巴特，联邦主义者和FrontPage杂志。