This article triangulates three scenes in which law, psychoanalysis and literary modernism intersect, in order to excavate differing conceptions of the idea of denial. The article begins with a consideration of the landmark censorship case against the editors of The Little Review, Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, for serialising James Joyce’s ‘obscene’ modernism; the article then shifts to the poet HD’s account of psychoanalysis with Sigmund Freud; and finally reflects on how HD’s poetic practice re-articulates ideas around psychoanalysis, law and denial. Drawing on thinkers across the fields of poetics, psychoanalysis and critical legal studies, this article argues that the concept of denial indexes a fundamental tension between the theoretical frameworks of psychoanalysis and the law. This article further argues that HD’s poetic practice seeks a mode of writing which can both represent and resist such theoretical constraint and contradiction.

中文翻译：

---

否定正义：现代主义时代的文学，法律和精神分析否认

本文从法律，心理分析和文学现代主义相交的三个场景中进行了三角剖析，以发掘否认概念的不同概念。本文首先考虑了针对《小评论》编辑玛格丽特·安德森和简·希普的具有里程碑意义的审查案，以序列化詹姆斯·乔伊斯的“淫秽”现代主义。然后，文章转向诗人HD对Sigmund Freud进行的心理分析的论述。最后反思HD的诗歌实践如何重新阐明围绕精神分析，法律和否认的观念。本文借鉴了诗学，心理分析和批判法律研究领域的思想家的观点，认为否认的概念是心理分析理论框架与法律之间的根本张力。