当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Oslo’s “new track”: Norwegian nuclear disarmament diplomacy, 2005–2013
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament ( IF 0.5 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-03 , DOI: 10.1080/25751654.2019.1671145
Kjølv Egeland 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Adopted by 122 non-nuclear-weapon states in July 2017, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) was promoted by a transnational network of government agencies, international organizations, and civil society actors. Now, as the agreement creeps towards entry into force, a debate about the history of the TPNW has begun. While supporters of the TPNW argue that the adoption of the treaty was a reasoned response to diplomatic impasse and the pileup of empirical evidence on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear detonations, revisionists have argued that the humanitarian initiative was never about banning nuclear weapons, but was hijacked by radicals eager to shame the Western nuclear powers or discredit the NPT. Reading the TPNW as a manifestation of “frustration” with lacking progress on disarmament in other forums, observers have framed the adoption of the TPNW as an irrational outburst of emotions. In this article, I investigate Norway’s nuclear disarmament diplomacy in the period from 2005 to 2013. Against the revisionists, I argue that the goal of negotiating a new legal instrument outlawing nuclear weapons provided a key aim for the Norwegian centre–left coalition government from 2010 onwards. Drawing on elite interviews, internal MFA documents released on freedom of information requests, and official statements by foreign policy officials, I maintain that the humanitarian initiative, including the pursuit of a new legal instrument, was products of a carefully deliberated policy of strategic social construction.

中文翻译:

奥斯陆的“新轨道”:挪威核裁军外交,2005-2013年

摘要《禁止核武器条约》(TPNW)于2017年7月被122个无核武器国家通过,由政府机构,国际组织和民间社会行为者的跨国网络推动。现在,随着该协议开始生效,关于TPNW历史的辩论已经开始。TPNW的支持者认为,通过该条约是对外交僵局的合理回应,是对核爆炸的人道主义后果的经验证据的堆积,而修正主义者则认为,人道主义倡议绝不是禁止核武器,而是被劫持了。渴望羞辱西方核大国或使《不扩散核武器条约》声名狼藉的激进分子。阅读TPNW表示“沮丧”,而其他论坛在裁军方面缺乏进展,观察家将TPNW的采用定为一种非理性的情绪爆发。在本文中,我研究了2005年至2013年期间挪威的核裁军外交。针对修正主义者,我认为,谈判一项禁止核武器的新法律文书的目标为2010年挪威中左翼联合政府提供了一个主要目标。向前。我依靠精英访谈,就信息自由发表的外交部内部文件以及外交政策官员的正式声明,我坚持认为,人道主义主动行动,包括寻求新的法律文书,是精心制定的战略社会建设政策的产物。我调查了2005年至2013年期间挪威的核裁军外交。针对修正主义者,我认为,谈判一项禁止核武器的新法律文书的目标为2010年起的挪威中左翼联合政府提供了一个主要目标。我依靠精英访谈,就信息自由发表的外交部内部文件以及外交政策官员的正式声明,我坚持认为,人道主义主动行动,包括寻求新的法律文书,是精心制定的战略社会建设政策的产物。我调查了2005年至2013年期间挪威的核裁军外交。针对修正主义者,我认为,谈判一项禁止核武器的新法律文书的目标为2010年起的挪威中左翼联合政府提供了一个主要目标。我依靠精英访谈,就信息自由发表的外交部内部文件以及外交政策官员的正式声明,我坚持认为,人道主义主动行动,包括寻求新的法律文书,是精心制定的战略社会建设政策的产物。
更新日期:2019-07-03
down
wechat
bug