The purpose of this article is to establish a connection between modelling practices and interpretive approaches in quantum mechanics, taking as a starting point the literature on scientific representation. Different types of modalities (epistemic, practical, conceptual and natural) play different roles in scientific representation. I postulate that the way theoretical structures are interpreted in this respect affects the way models are constructed. In quantum mechanics, this would be the case in particular of initial conditions and observables. I examine two formulations of quantum mechanics, the standard wave-function formulation and the consistent histories formulation, and show that they correspond to opposite stances, which confirms my approach. Finally, I examine possible strategies for deciding between these stances.

本文的目的是建立量子力学中建模实践与解释方法之间的联系，以此作为科学表示文献的起点。不同类型的模式（流行病，实践，概念和自然）在科学表示中起着不同的作用。我假设在这方面解释理论结构的方式会影响模型的构建方式。在量子力学中，尤其是在初始条件和可观察性的情况下。我研究了两种量子力学公式，即标准波函数公式和一致的历史公式，并表明它们对应于相反的立场，这证实了我的方法。最后，我研究了在这些立场之间做出决定的可能策略。