In this paper, we present a meta-analysis of the motivational and performance effects of experimentally induced achievement goals and the moderating effects of goal standard and goal framing; comprising 90 studies which provided 235 effect sizes (11,247 participants). The findings show that, relative to performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals and no-goals, induced mastery-approach goals enhanced performance, but not motivation. With regards to the goal standard used in the inducement, mastery-approach goals related to better performance than performance-approach goals, when mastery-approach goals were based on task-referenced standards or when social comparison was used as a standard for inducing performance-approach goals. With regards to the goal framing used in the inducement, mastery-approach goals were more beneficial when achievement goals were induced by means of goal content. We therefore conclude that goal framing and goal standard should be taken into consideration in achievement goal research and practice.

在本文中，我们对实验诱导的成就目标的动机和绩效影响以及目标标准和目标框架的调节作用进行了荟萃分析。; 包括90项研究，提供235种效果大小（11,247名参与者）。研究结果表明，相对于绩效方法和绩效回避目标以及无目标，诱导的精通方法目标可以提高绩效，但不能提高动机。关于诱导中使用的目标标准，精通方法目标比绩效方法目标更好，而精通方法目标是基于任务参考标准，或者将社会比较用作诱导绩效的标准时，接近目标。对于诱导中使用的目标框架，当通过目标内容诱导成就目标时，精通方法目标会更有益。因此，我们得出结论，在成就目标的研究和实践中应考虑目标框架和目标标准。