Amphiboly has been widely recognized, starting from the time of Aristotle, as an informal fallacy arising from grammatical ambiguity. This paper applies the profiles of dialogue tool to the fallacy of amphiboly, providing a five-step evidence-based procedure whereby a syntactically ambiguous sentence uttered in a natural language text can be evaluated as committing a fallacy of amphiboly (or not). A user applies the tool to a natural language text by comparing a descriptive graph, representing how the argumentation actually went, to a normative graph, representing how the argumentation should ideally have proceeded.

中文翻译：

---

Amphiboly 对话简介

从亚里士多德时代开始，Amphiboly 就被广泛认为是一种由语法歧义引起的非正式谬误。本文将对话工具的配置文件应用于 amphiboly 谬误，提供了一个基于证据的五步程序，由此可以将自然语言文本中句法歧义的句子评估为犯了 amphiboly 谬误（或不犯了）。用户通过将表示论证实际如何进行的描述图与表示论证理想情况下应该如何进行的规范图进行比较，将该工具应用于自然语言文本。