当前位置: X-MOL 学术Informal Logic › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Analysis of Implicit Premises within Children’s Argumentative Inferences
Informal Logic ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2018-12-18 , DOI: 10.22329/il.v38i4.5029
Sara Greco , Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont , Antonio Iannaccone , Andrea Rocci , Josephine Convertini , Rebecca Gabriela Schär

This paper presents preliminary findings of the project [name omitted for anonymity]. This interdisciplinary project builds on Argumentation theory and developmental sociocultural psychology for the study of children’s argumentation. We reconstruct children’s inferences in adult-child and child-child dialogical interaction in conversation in different settings. We focus in particular on implicit premises using the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) for the reconstruction of the inferential configuration of arguments. Our findings reveal that sources of misunderstandings are more often than not due to misalignments of implicit premises between adults and children; these misalignments concern material premises rather than the inferential-procedural level.

中文翻译:

儿童论证推理中隐含前提的分析

本文介绍了该项目的初步调查结果 [因匿名而省略名称]。这个跨学科项目建立在争论理论和发展社会文化心理学的基础上,用于研究儿童的争论。我们在不同环境下的对话中重建儿童对成人-儿童和儿童-儿童对话互动的推断。我们特别关注使用主题论证模型 (AMT) 来重建论证的推理配置的隐式前提。我们的研究结果表明,误解的根源往往是由于成人和儿童之间隐含前提的错位;这些不一致涉及物质前提,而不是推理程序层面。
更新日期:2018-12-18
down
wechat
bug