I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we need to develop novel standards of inference goodness or specific argument schemes for properly assessing them. Following LNMA’s theoretical framework, I provide a semantic account of conductions and explain the interesting pragmatic properties of a certain type of conductions (i.e., balance of considerations or pro-and-con argumentation) in terms of the rhetorical dimension of the speech-act of arguing.

中文翻译：

---

传导评估

我认为传导确实是一种特殊类型的推理，但这并不意味着我们需要开发新的推理标准或特定的论证方案来正确评估它们。遵循 LNMA 的理论框架，我提供了传导的语义解释，并根据言语行为的修辞维度解释了某种传导的有趣语用特性（即，考虑的平衡或赞成和反对的论证）。争论。