The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal that explored the ideas in Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument (2014), where arguing is understood as the theoretical or theory-forming activity that can be found in research of all kinds. Thus, the approach taken focuses on the validity of theses. This approach is clarified further as the author considers points raised by his commentators and provides answers and, where necessary, corrections.

中文翻译：

---

论辩的概念回复评论员：阐明主题、回答问题、解决异议

该论文对 Vol. 1 中发表的论文进行了一系列回应。37, No. 3, 该期刊探讨了 Harald Wohlrapp 的 The Concept of Argument (2014) 中的思想，其中争论被理解为可以在各种研究中找到的理论或理论形成活动。因此，所采取的方法侧重于论文的有效性。当作者考虑他的评论员提出的观点并提供答案并在必要时进行更正时，这种方法得到了进一步澄清。