A case in California reaffirms that courts are reluctant to intervene when families are concerned about school curricula. In CAPEEM v. Torlakson, parents of Hindu children complained that the state’s history and social science standards are framework discriminated against them by inaccurately and disparingingly representing their faith. Bob Kim describes the plaintiffs’ arguments, the case’s journey through the courts, and how the court’s ruling against the plaintiffs relates to other cases involving objections to school curricula.

中文翻译：

---

根据法律规定：您的社区在课程中如何体现？谁决定？

加州的一个案件重申，当家庭对学校课程感到担忧时，法院不愿进行干预。在CAPEEM v。Torlakson案中，印度裔儿童的父母抱怨说，国家的历史和社会科学标准是对他们的歧视，因为他们不准确地，卑鄙地代表了他们的信仰。鲍勃·金（Bob Kim）描述了原告的论点，案件在法庭上的历程以及法院对原告的裁决与涉及反对学校课程的其他案件之间的关系。