Gibson once suggested that his ecological approach could provide architecture and design with a new theoretical basis. Erik Rietveld takes up this suggestion—the concept of affordances figures prominently not only in his philosophical and scientific work but also in the design practices he is engaged in. However, as Gibson introduced affordances as a functional concept, it seems ill-suited to capture the many dimensions of our lived experience of the (manufactured) environment. Can the concept of affordances also take on the expressive and aesthetic qualities of artifacts and buildings?

中文翻译：

---

负担概念提供了什么？

吉布森曾经提出他的生态学方法可以为建筑和设计提供新的理论基础。埃里克·里特维尔德（Erik Rietveld）接受了这一建议-负担能力的概念不仅在他的哲学和科学工作中而且在他从事的设计实践中都占有重要地位。但是，由于吉布森（Gibson）将负担能力作为一种功能性概念引入，它似乎不适合捕获我们在（制造）环境中的丰富经验。负担能力的概念还能兼具文物和建筑物的表现力和美学品质吗？