Reaction of [Ru(acac)₂(MeCN)₂], acac⁻=acetylacetonate, with N‐phenylcamphoriminoquinone (pciq) or the new N‐(2‐thiomethylphenyl)‐camphoriminoquinone (tciq) produces complexes [Ru(acac)₂(pciq)] and [Ru(acac)₂(tciq)] with N,O or N,S coordination and E or Z configuration at the C=N bond, respectively. Oxidation state assignments in comparison with classical iminoquinone ligands are based on structural data in connection with DFT calculations. Reversible oxidation yields complex ions [Ru^III(acac)₂(pciq)]⁺ and [Ru^III(acac)₂(tciq)]⁺ as characterized by EPR, IR and UV‐vis‐NIR spectroelectrochemistry.

中文翻译：

---

钌化合物[Ru（acac）2（ciq）]与不明确的樟脑亚氨基醌（ciq）配体的分子内电荷转移

的反应的[Ru（ACAC）₂（MeCN中）₂ ]，乙酰丙酮^- =乙酰丙酮化物，具有Ñ -phenylcamphoriminoquinone（pciq）或新ñ - （2-硫甲基苯基）-camphoriminoquinone（tciq）产生的复合物的[Ru（ACAC）₂（ pciq）]和[Ru（acac）₂（tciq）]分别在C = N键处具有N，O或N，S配位和E或Z构型。与经典亚氨基醌配体相比，氧化态分配基于与DFT计算相关的结构数据。可逆氧化产生复合离子[Ru ^III（acac）₂（pciq）] ⁺和[Ru ^III（acac）₂（tciq）] ⁺由EPR，IR和UV-vis-NIR光谱电化学表征。