当前位置: X-MOL 学术Work & Stress › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies
Work & Stress ( IF 5.6 ) Pub Date : 2018-10-02 , DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065
Tino Lesener 1 , Burkhard Gusy 1 , Christine Wolter 1, 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

The job demands-resources (JD-R) model is an influential framework to understand how job characteristics foster employee well-being. Differing from the cross-sectional focus of most JD-R model reviews, this meta-analytic review uses longitudinal evidence to validate the essential assumptions within the JD-R model. We highlight two aspects: (1) The assessment of the methodological quality of the available longitudinal studies, and (2) the examination of the essential assumptions – the impact of job characteristics on well-being, and vice-versa – with meta-analytic structural equation modelling (metaSEM). We included 74 studies and evaluated their quality. Eighteen studies suffered from serious methodological shortcomings, whereas 29 studies (39%) were considered high-quality studies. Our meta-analytic structural equation models confirmed the essential assumptions simultaneously. The quality of the studies also had an influence on the goodness-of-fit indices. The models with reciprocal assumptions between job characteristics and well-being fitted the data best. The findings of this meta-analytic review suggest that the JD-R model is an excellent theoretical basis to assess employee well-being for a broad range of organisations. However, more research is needed to clarify the reciprocal relationships between job characteristics and employee well-being, as well as the different influences of challenging and hindering job demands on work engagement.



中文翻译:

工作需求-资源模型:纵向研究的元分析回顾

摘要

工作需求资源(JD-R)模型是一个有影响力的框架,可用来了解工作特征如何促进员工的福祉。与大多数JD-R模型审阅的横截面重点不同,本荟萃分析审阅使用纵向证据来验证JD-R模型内的基本假设。我们着重强调两个方面:(1)对现有纵向研究的方法学质量进行评估,以及(2)使用荟萃分析对基本假设(工作特征对幸福感的影响,反之亦然)进行检查结构方程模型(metaSEM)。我们纳入了74项研究并评估了其质量。18项研究存在严重的方法学缺陷,而29项研究(占39%)被认为是高质量的研究。我们的荟萃分析结构方程模型同时确认了基本假设。研究的质量也影响拟合优度指标。在工作特征和幸福感之间具有相互假设的模型最适合数据。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,JD-R模型是评估广泛组织的员工福利的极佳理论基础。但是,需要更多的研究来阐明工作特征与员工福祉之间的相互关系,以及挑战和阻碍工作需求对工作投入的不同影响。在工作特征和幸福感之间具有相互假设的模型最适合数据。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,JD-R模型是评估广泛组织的员工福利的极佳理论基础。但是,需要更多的研究来阐明工作特征与员工福祉之间的相互关系,以及挑战和阻碍工作需求对工作投入的不同影响。在工作特征和幸福感之间具有相互假设的模型最适合数据。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,JD-R模型是评估广泛组织的员工福利的极佳理论基础。但是,需要更多的研究来阐明工作特征与员工福祉之间的相互关系,以及挑战和阻碍工作需求对工作投入的不同影响。

更新日期:2018-10-02
down
wechat
bug