This paper introduces a new gender-integration analysis framework to examine gender- and integration-responsiveness of relevant legislation in Germany and Sweden. The framework employs five analytical steps: 1) preparation of an ‘international legal frame’ to underline ‘gender’ and ‘integration’ needs at workplaces, 2) preparation of a ‘national legal frame’ to examine if existing legislation incorporates identified ‘gender’ and ‘integration’ needs, 3) compilation of subjective experiences of women migrants relating to discriminatory practices at workplaces, 4) interpretation of expert's perspectives towards missing legal clauses and existing barriers to implementation, and 5) classification of legislation with respect to their gender- as well as integration-responsiveness. The findings reveal that the prevailing legislation do incorporate ‘gender’ to some extent, but neglect ‘integration’ to a large extent and thus offer partial protection to women migrants against discriminatory practices at workplaces. The Swedish legislation appear more gender- as well as integration-sensitive on selected needs than that of Germany. The inferences underline a dire need to conduct proper ‘gender’ as well as ‘integration’ analysis of relevant legislation to ensure smooth economic integration of women migrants in both countries.

本文介绍了一个新的性别融合分析框架，以检查德国和瑞典有关立法对性别和融合的响应能力。该框架采用五个分析步骤：1）制定“国际法律框架”以强调工作场所的“性别”和“融合”需求； 2）制定“国家法律框架”以检查现有法律是否包含已确定的“性别”和“融合”需求，3）汇总有关工作场所歧视性做法的女性移民的主观经验，4）解释专家对于缺失的法律条款和现有实施障碍的观点，以及5）关于性别的立法分类-以及集成响应能力。调查结果表明，现行立法确实在某种程度上纳入了“性别”，但在很大程度上忽视了“融合”，因此为移徙女工提供了部分保护，使其免受工作场所的歧视性待遇。与德国相比，瑞典的立法在选择的需求上对性别以及融合更加敏感。这些推论突显了迫切需要对相关立法进行适当的“性别”和“融合”分析，以确保两国女性移民的平稳经济融合。