当前位置: X-MOL 学术Health, Risk & Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A systematic review of frames in news reporting of health risks: Characteristics, construct consistency vs. name diversity, and the relationship of frames to framing functions
Health, Risk & Society ( IF 2.659 ) Pub Date : 2018-09-21 , DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2018.1522422
Viorela Dan 1 , Juliana Raupp 2
Affiliation  

Risk professionals and scholars have long recognised the media as a key player in the social construction of risk. Many investigations into the frames journalists use when covering risks were published in recent years. Yet, keeping track of this literature has become increasingly difficult because authors tend to introduce new frames with every new study. This study reports a systematic review of studies on news frames on health risks. We pursue three central aims: (1) to determine if some of the frame-names circulating in the literature stand for very similar or even identical constructs (and can thus be condensed); (2) to determine how they relate to the four framing functions and to each other; and (3) to aggregate findings on the nature of frames in the media coverage of health risks. This should facilitate future reviews of literature and the formulation of hypotheses, substantiate discussions on the quality of risk reporting, add nuance to what has been a blanket criticism of the media, and help building framing theory by improving its consistency. We found 45 frame-names for just 15 frames, and a tendency to delineate frames for each framing function; some frames were unrelated to the framing functions. The frames that drew most scholarly interest were also the ones employed most often by journalists. Some generalisable statements regarding the use of frames in health-risk reporting can be made, though caution is advised given gaps in the evidence and variations by health risk and/or country of study.



中文翻译:

对健康风险新闻报道中框架的系统评价:特征,结构一致性与名称多样性以及框架与框架功能的关系

风险专业人士和学者长期以来一直认为媒体是风险社会建设中的关键角色。近年来,对记者在报道风险时使用的框架进行了许多调查。但是,要跟踪这些文献变得越来越困难,因为作者倾向于在每项新研究中引入新的框架。这项研究报告了有关健康风险新闻框架研究的系统综述。我们追求三个主要目标:(1)确定文献中流传的某些框架名称是否代表非常相似或什至完全相同的结构(因此可以简化);(2)确定它们与四个框架功能以及彼此之间的关系;(3)汇总有关媒体对健康风险报道的框架性质的发现。这应该有利于将来对文献的回顾和假设的提出,充实关于风险报告质量的讨论,为对媒体的全面批评增加细微差别,并通过改善框架理论的一致性来帮助构建框架理论。我们发现只有15个帧的45个帧名称,并且倾向于为每个成帧功能描绘帧。一些帧与取景功能无关。引起学术界最大兴趣的框架也是新闻工作者最常使用的框架。可以就健康风险报告中使用框架做出一些可概括性的陈述,尽管鉴于证据的差距和健康风险和/或研究国家/地区的差异,建议谨慎行事。在对媒体的全面批评中增加细微差别,并通过提高其一致性来帮助构建框架理论。我们发现只有15个帧的45个帧名称,并且倾向于为每个成帧功能描绘帧。一些帧与取景功能无关。引起学术界最大兴趣的框架也是新闻工作者最常使用的框架。可以就健康风险报告中使用框架做出一些可概括性的陈述,尽管鉴于证据的差距和健康风险和/或研究国家/地区的差异,建议谨慎行事。在对媒体的全面批评中增加细微差别,并通过提高其一致性来帮助构建框架理论。我们发现只有15个帧的45个帧名称,并且倾向于为每个成帧功能描绘帧。一些帧与取景功能无关。引起学术界最大兴趣的框架也是新闻工作者最常使用的框架。可以就健康风险报告中使用框架做出一些可概括性的陈述,尽管鉴于证据的差距和健康风险和/或研究国家/地区的差异,建议谨慎行事。引起学术界最大兴趣的框架也是新闻工作者最常使用的框架。可以就健康风险报告中使用框架做出一些可概括性的陈述,尽管鉴于证据的差距和健康风险和/或研究国家/地区的差异,建议谨慎行事。引起学术界最大兴趣的框架也是新闻工作者最常使用的框架。可以就健康风险报告中使用框架做出一些可概括性的陈述,尽管建议谨慎行事,因为存在证据差异以及健康风险和/或研究国家/地区之间的差异。

更新日期:2018-09-21
down
wechat
bug