A critical, multilevel conceptual framework provides alternative ways of addressing the question, Who counts as family later in life? The conceptual approach incorporates core ideas from life course, critical, and feminist perspectives, as well as the concept of ambivalence. Three meanings of the word count are used to address who should be included as family, which family ties are personally meaningful in the second half of life, and which family ties are significant sources of support. The article closes by exploring how to make research count: What are the policy and research implications of variations in who should be counted as family, who counts subjectively, and who can be counted on in mid‐ and later life? The macro–meso–micro framework connects societal and institutional arrangements to individuals and their family ties, emphasizing the need to balance individual and collective responsibility in order to support family relations across the life course.

中文翻译：

---

谁在以后的生活中算作家庭？遵循理论指导

一个关键的，多层次的概念框架提供了解决以下问题的替代方法：谁在以后的生活中算作家庭？概念方法结合了人生历程，批判和女权主义观点的核心思想，以及矛盾的概念。字数统计的三个含义用于说明谁应该被包括在家庭中，哪些家庭关系在下半生中对个人有意义，哪些家庭关系是重要的支持来源。本文通过探讨如何使研究成为重要的文章而结束：应将谁算作家庭，谁主观地算以及在中后期可以依靠谁的变化对政策和研究的意义是什么？宏观-微观-微观框架将社会和制度安排与个人及其家庭纽带联系起来，强调需要平衡个人和集体责任，以便在整个生命过程中支持家庭关系。