Feminist philosophy has offered mixed opinions on the collaborative projects of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. But although there has been much discussion of the political expediency of what Deleuze and Guattari do say about sexual difference, this article will outline what is absent from Anti‐Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus (the two volumes comprising Capitalism and Schizophrenia). Specifically, I will argue that though Deleuze and Guattari offer a historical account of a range of power structures—most notably capitalism, but also despotism, fascism, and authoritarianism—they give no such account of the development of patriarchy. Secondarily, this article will argue that Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of contemporary power relations could be improved by adding an accompanying analysis of the institution of patriarchy. After offering a detailed account of the technical vocabulary used by Deleuze and Guattari for the analysis of political institutions, I will argue that what their work requires is an account of how patriarchy is historically produced by an “abstract machine” of masculinity. This article will finish with some suggestions for the way that such an account could be given via an analysis of the abstract machine of phallusization.

中文翻译：

---

德勒兹和瓜塔里对父权制的分析

女权主义哲学对吉尔斯·德勒兹（Gilles Deleuze）和费利克斯·瓜塔里（FélixGuattari）的合作项目提出了不同意见。但是，尽管人们对德勒兹和瓜塔里所说的关于性别差异的政治权宜之计进行了很多讨论，但本文将概述反俄狄俄斯和千高原（资本主义和精神分裂症两卷））。具体来说，我将争辩说，尽管德勒兹（Deleuze）和瓜塔里（Guattari）提供了一系列权力结构的历史说明，其中最著名的是资本主义，但专制主义，法西斯主义和威权主义却没有说明父权制的发展。其次，本文认为，通过增加对父权制度的伴随分析，可以改善德勒兹和瓜塔里对当代权力关系的分析。在详细介绍了德勒兹（Deleuze）和瓜塔里（Guattari）用于分析政治机构的技术词汇之后，我将辩解说，他们的工作所需要的是对历史上男性气概的“抽象机器”如何产生父权制的描述。阳具。