当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era: Lessons from Singapore and Seoul
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2018-07-20 , DOI: 10.1002/app5.255
Kris Hartley 1 , Jun Jie Woo 2 , Sun Kyo Chung 3
Affiliation  

This article examines the impact of policies for start‐up and entrepreneurship on the developmental model that remains a policy legacy in many Asian countries. The main argument is that the influence of central planning is deeply embedded in the institutions of the Four Asian Tigers, but globalisation and economic liberalisation are disrupting the old developmentalism by incentivising innovation and structural adaptability. In practice, although developmentalism once focused on infrastructure and industrial policy, softer strategies such as attracting educated millennials through urban amenities and creative clustering mimic those of the postindustrial West. Either this trend represents the end of developmentalism or top‐down industrial policy is being rebranded to embrace knowledge and service industries. This article examines this issue at the urban scale, examining policies used by Singapore and Seoul to encourage start‐ups and entrepreneurship in the context of innovation. Government documents are examined and findings compared.

中文翻译:

后发展时代的城市创新政策:新加坡和首尔的经验教训

本文研究了创业和创业政策对发展模型的影响,而发展模型仍然是许多亚洲国家的传统政策。主要论点是,中央计划的影响已深深地根植于“四小龙四虎”的制度之中,但是全球化和经济自由化通过激励创新和结构适应性,正在破坏旧的发展主义。在实践中,尽管发展主义曾经侧重于基础设施和产业政策,但较软的战略,例如通过城市便利设施吸引受过教育的千禧一代,以及创造性的集群模仿了后工业化的西方。这种趋势要么代表发展主义的终结,要么是自上而下的产业政策被重塑以涵盖知识和服务业。本文在城市范围内研究了这一问题,并研究了新加坡和首尔在创新背景下鼓励创业和企业家精神的政策。检查政府文件并比较调查结果。
更新日期:2018-07-20
down
wechat
bug