当前位置: X-MOL 学术Neuropsychol. Rehabilit. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A scoping review of the utility of self-report and informant-report prospective memory measures
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-21 , DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1875851
Nicole Sugden 1 , Matt Thomas 1 , Michael Kiernan 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

There has been increased use of self-report prospective memory (PM) scales in recent years, despite uncertainty about their validity. This study reviewed how self-and informant-report PM questionnaires have been used in the assessment of PM. We evaluated relationships between self-report, informant-report, and performance-based PM measures, and the validity of using self-report measures in detecting PM impairments and monitoring intervention outcomes. The scoping review methodology of Arksey and O'Malley (2005 Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 1932. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32) was used. Database searches yielded 488 published studies that used the Prospective Memory Questionnaire (PMQ), Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ), Comprehensive Assessment of PM (CAPM), and Brief Assessment of PM (BAPM). The self-report and informant-report measures of PM had weak- to moderate-strength relationships with performance-based PM measures. Some self-report PM scales could detect PM impairments and monitor intervention outcomes, however few studies had investigated this. The findings indicated that self- and informant-report scales measure different constructs to performance-based measures of PM. It is recommended that these scales be used alongside performance-based measures to provide complementary and comprehensive assessments of PM. Further research into assessment of PM using self-report measures will aid assessment and treatment choices.



中文翻译:

自我报告和知情人报告前瞻性记忆测量的效用的范围审查

摘要

近年来,自我报告前瞻记忆 (PM) 量表的使用有所增加,尽管其有效性存在不确定性。本研究回顾了自我报告和知情人报告 PM 问卷在 PM 评估中的应用。我们评估了自我报告、知情人报告和基于绩效的 PM 措施之间的关系,以及使用自我报告措施检测 PM 损伤和监测干预结果的有效性。Arksey 和 O'Malley 的范围审查方法(2005 年) Arksey, H.O'Malley, L. ( 2005 年)。范围研究:迈向方法论框架国际社会研究方法学杂志8 (1), 1932https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 [泰勒和弗朗西斯在线]  ,[谷歌学术]。范围研究:迈向方法论框架。国际社会研究方法学杂志,8(1), 19-32) 被使用。数据库搜索产生了 488 项已发表的研究,这些研究使用了前瞻性记忆问卷 (PMQ)、前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷 (PRMQ)、PM 综合评估 (CAPM) 和 PM 简要评估 (BAPM)。PM 的自我报告和线人报告测量与基于绩效的 PM 测量具有弱到中等强度的关系。一些自我报告的 PM 量表可以检测 PM 损伤并监测干预结果,但很少有研究对此进行调查。研究结果表明,自我报告量表和线人报告量表测量的结构与基于绩效的 PM 测量不同。建议将这些量表与基于绩效的措施一起使用,以提供对 PM 的补充和全面评估。

更新日期:2021-01-21
down
wechat
bug