On the Validity of Validation: A Commentary on Rufat, Tate, Emrich, and Antolini’s “How Valid Are Social Vulnerability Models?”,Annals of the American Association of Geographers

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

On the Validity of Validation: A Commentary on Rufat, Tate, Emrich, and Antolini’s “How Valid Are Social Vulnerability Models?”
Annals of the American Association of Geographers ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-21 , DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1857220
Barry Flanagan ₁ , Elaine Hallisey ₁ , J. Danielle Sharpe ₁ , Caitlin E. Mertzlufft ₁ , Marissa Grossman ₁

Affiliation

(2021). On the Validity of Validation: A Commentary on Rufat, Tate, Emrich, and Antolini’s “How Valid Are Social Vulnerability Models?”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers: Vol. 111, No. 4, pp. em-i-em-vi.

中文翻译：

关于验证的有效性：评Rufat，Tate，Emrich和Antolini的“社会脆弱性模型的有效性如何？”

（2021年）。关于验证的有效性：评Rufat，Tate，Emrich和Antolini的“社会脆弱性模型的有效性如何？”。美国地理学家协会志：第1卷。111，第4号，第em-i-em-vi页。

更新日期：2021-01-21

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊最新论文