Gender is commonly identified as a key explanatory factor for travel behaviour. Since women’s role in societal structure has changed in the past few decades, the question arises as to whether the “gender” factor still plays a decisive role in differences in mobility within the working population. The aim of this paper is to extend the research on gendered differences in mobility by providing an in-depth analysis of how the main determinants of daily mobility affect male and female workers differently. Unlike previous research, our econometric models included terms that express the interactions between the explanatory variables (socioeconomic variables and transport mode access) and a dichotomous gender variable, to accurately identify the marginal impact of gender on mobility indicators. Based on the Rhône-Alpes regional household travel survey (2012–2015), which includes France’s second largest urban area, the results show that even if gender differences in employment status and access to the private car are eliminated, differences in travel patterns between men and women would still be observed because the two genders do not have identical factor sensitivities. From a policy perspective, these results suggest that authorities have to adopt a gender perspective to ensure that in the future urban mobility policies provide gender equity in the context of the sustainable development of transport networks.

性别通常被认为是旅行行为的关键解释因素。由于在过去几十年中妇女在社会结构中的作用发生了变化，因此出现了一个问题，即“性别”因素是否仍在劳动人口流动性差异中起决定性作用。本文的目的是通过深入分析日常流动性的主要决定因素如何对男性和女性工人产生不同的影响，扩大对流动性性别差异的研究。与以前的研究不同，我们的计量经济学模型包含一些术语，这些术语表示解释变量（社会经济变量和交通方式获取）与两分性别变量之间的相互作用，以准确识别性别对流动性指标的边际影响。根据罗纳-阿尔卑斯大区的家庭出行调查（2012-2015年），其中包括法国第二大城市地区，结果表明，即使消除了就业状况和私家车出入方面的性别差异，男性之间的出行方式也有所差异仍然会观察到妇女，因为这两个性别对因子的敏感性不同。从政策角度来看，这些结果表明，当局必须采取性别观点，以确保未来的城市交通政策在交通网络的可持续发展范围内实现性别平等。仍然会观察到男女之间旅行方式的差异，因为这两种性别对因子的敏感性不同。从政策角度来看，这些结果表明，当局必须采取性别观点，以确保未来的城市交通政策在交通网络的可持续发展范围内实现性别平等。仍然会观察到男女之间旅行方式的差异，因为这两种性别对因子的敏感性不同。从政策角度来看，这些结果表明，当局必须采取性别观点，以确保未来的城市交通政策在交通网络的可持续发展范围内实现性别平等。