当前位置: X-MOL 学术Nat. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Effect of a plant-based, low-fat diet versus an animal-based, ketogenic diet on ad libitum energy intake
Nature Medicine ( IF 58.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-21 , DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-01209-1
Kevin D Hall 1 , Juen Guo 1 , Amber B Courville 1 , James Boring 2 , Robert Brychta 1 , Kong Y Chen 1 , Valerie Darcey 1 , Ciaran G Forde 3 , Ahmed M Gharib 1 , Isabelle Gallagher 1 , Rebecca Howard 1 , Paule V Joseph 4, 5 , Lauren Milley 1 , Ronald Ouwerkerk 1 , Klaudia Raisinger 2 , Irene Rozga 1 , Alex Schick 1 , Michael Stagliano 1 , Stephan Torres 2 , Mary Walter 1 , Peter Walter 1 , Shanna Yang 2 , Stephanie T Chung 1
Affiliation  

The carbohydrate–insulin model of obesity posits that high-carbohydrate diets lead to excess insulin secretion, thereby promoting fat accumulation and increasing energy intake. Thus, low-carbohydrate diets are predicted to reduce ad libitum energy intake as compared to low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets. To test this hypothesis, 20 adults aged 29.9 ± 1.4 (mean ± s.e.m.) years with body mass index of 27.8 ± 1.3 kg m−2 were admitted as inpatients to the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and randomized to consume ad libitum either a minimally processed, plant-based, low-fat diet (10.3% fat, 75.2% carbohydrate) with high glycemic load (85 g 1,000 kcal−1) or a minimally processed, animal-based, ketogenic, low-carbohydrate diet (75.8% fat, 10.0% carbohydrate) with low glycemic load (6 g 1,000 kcal−1) for 2 weeks followed immediately by the alternate diet for 2 weeks. One participant withdrew due to hypoglycemia during the low-carbohydrate diet. The primary outcomes compared mean daily ad libitum energy intake between each 2-week diet period as well as between the final week of each diet. We found that the low-fat diet led to 689 ± 73 kcal d−1 less energy intake than the low-carbohydrate diet over 2 weeks (P < 0.0001) and 544 ± 68 kcal d−1 less over the final week (P < 0.0001). Therefore, the predictions of the carbohydrate–insulin model were inconsistent with our observations. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03878108.



中文翻译:


植物性低脂饮食与动物性生酮饮食对随意能量摄入的影响



肥胖的碳水化合物-胰岛素模型认为,高碳水化合物饮食会导致胰岛素分泌过多,从而促进脂肪积累并增加能量摄入。因此,与低脂肪、高碳水化合物饮食相比,低碳水化合物饮食预计会减少随意的能量摄入。为了检验这一假设,美国国立卫生研究院临床中心收治了 20 名年龄为 29.9 ± 1.4(平均值 ± sem)、体重指数为 27.8 ± 1.3 kg m −2 的成年人,他们被随机分为随意食用或最低限度食用。加工过的植物性低脂饮食(10.3% 脂肪,75.2% 碳水化合物),高血糖负荷(85 g 1,000 kcal -1 )或最低限度加工的动物性生酮低碳水化合物饮食(75.8% 脂肪) ,10.0%碳水化合物)和低血糖负荷(6 g 1,000 kcal -1 )持续两周,随后立即采用替代饮食持续两周。一名参与者因低碳水化合物饮食期间出现低血糖而退出。主要结果比较了每个两周饮食周期之间以及每个饮食最后一周之间的平均每日随意能量摄入量。我们发现,在两周内,低脂饮食比低碳水化合物饮食减少了 689 ± 73 kcal d -1 的能量摄入 ( P < 0.0001),在最后一周减少了 544 ± 68 kcal d -1 ( P < 0.0001)。因此,碳水化合物-胰岛素模型的预测与我们的观察不一致。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册为 NCT03878108。

更新日期:2021-01-21
down
wechat
bug