ABSTRACT

In a recent edition of Globalizations Jason Hickel made three main points towards clarifying the discussion of Degrowth. His contribution reinforced some important elements in the Degrowth claim, especially the fact that it is in no way to be identified with recession, and that there is a vast amount of evidence against the belief that growth of GDP can be decoupled from growth in resource consumption. However, I want to argue against his perspective on distinguishing between Degrowth and reducing the GDP, his conception of Degrowth, and whether the Third World should be exempt from it.

中文翻译：

---

退化是什么意思？对 Jason Hickel 的“几点澄清”的一些评论

摘要

在最近一期的《全球化》中，杰森·希克尔 (Jason Hickel) 提出了三个要点，以阐明对退化的讨论。他的贡献强化了 Degrowth 主张中的一些重要因素，尤其是它绝不与衰退等同的事实，并且有大量证据反对 GDP 增长可以与资源消耗增长脱钩的观点。 . 但是，我想反驳他对区分Degrowth和减少GDP的观点，他的Degrowth概念，以及第三世界是否应该被豁免。