当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Financial Services Research › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How Much Does Your Banker’s Target-Specific Experience Matter? Evidence from Target IPO Underwriters that Advise Acquirers
Journal of Financial Services Research ( IF 1.5 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-15 , DOI: 10.1007/s10693-020-00346-5
Richard Herron

In a sample of 1,507 US all-public acquisitions from 1985–2014, 5% of acquirers use the same advisor that underwrote the target’s initial public offering. Acquirers who use these informed advisors have acquisition announcement three-day cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) that are 2.048 percentage points higher, all else equal. Same-advisor acquisition announcements have higher combined CARs but not lower target CARs, suggesting higher synergies instead of lower deal premia. Same-advisor acquisition announcement outperformance decays as the target ages and grows. These findings show the value and timeliness of investment bank information production, retention, and transfer.

中文翻译:

您的银行家的特定目标经验有多重要?目标 IPO 承销商为收购方提供建议的证据

在 1985 年至 2014 年间 1,507 次美国全公开收购的样本中,5% 的收购者使用与承销目标公司首次公开募股的顾问相同的顾问。使用这些知情顾问的收购方有收购公告,为期三天的累积异常回报 (CAR) 高出 2.048 个百分点,其他条件相同。同一顾问收购公告的综合资本充足率较高,但目标资本充足率并没有降低,这表明协同效应更高,而不是交易溢价更低。随着目标的老化和增长,同一顾问收购公告的表现会减弱。这些发现显示了投资银行信息生产、保留和转移的价值和及时性。
更新日期:2021-01-15
down
wechat
bug