On 12 November 2019, the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP), handed down a landmark decision in the case of ‘Katsa Su’ concerning the Awa indigenous group in Colombia. The Colombian conflict has particularly affected indigenous groups, such as the Awa people, and has also affected the territory in which they live. In this article, we explore the decision of the JEP, within a broader analysis of the Colombian peace agreement and consider how it might help us to think about the place of the environment in the Women, Peace and Security agenda and in international law. We call for a gendered and intersectional approach to environmental peacebuilding which is attentive to the importance of gender and different groups. Further, we highlight how the Colombian example shows how concepts such as relief, recovery and reparations are often confined in international law to women's recovery and redress with respect to sexual violence and yet, this conceptualization should be much broader. The Katsa Su case provides an example of the fact that reparations and redress must address other forms of violence, spiritual and ecological, which women also suffer in times of conflict.

中文翻译：

---

妇女、和平与安全的本质：哥伦比亚的观点

2019 年 11 月 12 日，和平特别管辖区 (JEP) 就哥伦比亚阿瓦土著群体的“Katsa Su”案作出了具有里程碑意义的裁决。哥伦比亚冲突特别影响了土著群体，例如阿瓦人，也影响了他们居住的地区。在本文中，我们在对哥伦比亚和平协议的更广泛分析中探讨 JEP 的决定，并考虑它如何帮助我们思考环境在妇女、和平与安全议程和国际法中的位置。我们呼吁对环境和平建设采取性别和交叉方法，关注性别和不同群体的重要性。此外，我们强调哥伦比亚的例子如何展示救济等概念，恢复和赔偿在国际法中往往仅限于妇女在性暴力方面的恢复和补救，然而，这种概念应该更广泛。Katsa Su 案提供了一个例子，说明赔偿和补救必须解决其他形式的暴力、精神和生态暴力，妇女在冲突时期也会遭受这些暴力。