Dual-Process Models of Attitudes (DPMA) have provided new concepts and methods for attitude-behavior research in the field of transportation. Notwithstanding, there is a lack of critical reviews on this topic; leaving researchers with an unclear picture of the key issues to consider in developing new research. This paper reviews previous studies on DPMA in traffic and transportation research. A systematic review of English and non-English language articles using Transport Research International Documentation (TRID) as main database was conducted. Additional studies were identified by searching in ScienceDirect and Google Scholar. A total of 1674 references were revised. Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Four central issues were examined: (a) the role of implicit and explicit attitudes in transport behavior, (b) the degree of relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes, (c) the types of measures used to assess implicit attitudes, and (d) the malleability of implicit attitudes. The review has identified that: (a) implicit attitudes were associated with a wide variety of transport-related behavior, (b) implicit and explicit attitudes were weakly correlated (mean correlation, weighted by sample size was r = 0.11), and little knowledge exists on factors moderating the implicit-explicit relationship, (c) the evidence on the indirect measures’ better resistance to social desirability bias as compared with traditional techniques is scant and inconclusive, (d) some studies exhibit problems in the application of indirect measures, and (e) few studies (n = 2) aimed to evaluate interventions for attitude change. The analysis showed the sustained growth of the applications, the potential of DPMA, and the need for more rigorous research. Most studies of area do not consider the theoretical and methodological shortcomings of the DPMA, and tend to be based on a controversial notion of implicit and explicit attitudes.

态度双重过程模型（DPMA）为交通领域的态度行为研究提供了新的概念和方法。尽管如此，对此主题缺乏严格的评论。使研究人员不清楚在开展新研究时应考虑的关键问题。本文回顾了先前在交通运输研究中关于DPMA的研究。使用国际运输研究文献（TRID）作为主要数据库，系统地审查了英语和非英语文章。通过在ScienceDirect和Google Scholar中搜索，可以确定其他研究。总共修订了1674篇参考文献。二十八篇文章符合纳入标准。研究了四个中心问题：（a）内隐和外在态度在运输行为中的作用，（b）内隐态度与外显态度之间的关系程度，（c）用于评估内隐态度的度量类型，以及（d）内隐态度的可塑性。审查发现：（a）内隐态度与多种与运输有关的行为有关，（b）内隐态度与外显态度之间的相关性很弱（均值相关性，样本量加权为r  = 0.11），并且几乎没有关于调节隐性-显性关系的因素的知识，（c）间接措施与传统技术相比对社会期望偏差的抵抗力更强的证据尚无定论，（d）一些研究表明间接措施应用中的问题，以及（e）很少有 旨在评估态度改变干预措施的研究（n = 2）。分析显示应用程序的持续增长，DPMA的潜力以及需要进行更严格研究的必要性。大多数领域研究没有考虑DPMA的理论和方法上的缺陷，而是倾向于基于有争议的隐性和显性态度的概念。