The evaluation of how (human) individuals perceive robots is a central issue to better understand human–robot interaction (HRI). On this topic, promising proposals have emerged. However, present tools are not able to assess a sufficient part of the composite psychological dimensions involved in the evaluation of HRI. Indeed, the percentage of variance explained is often under the recommended threshold for a construct to be valid. In this article, we consolidate the lessons learned from three different studies and propose a further developed questionnaire based on a multicomponent approach of anthropomorphism by adding traits from psychosocial theory about the perception of others and the attribution and deprivation of human characteristics: the de-humanization theory. Among these characteristics, the attribution of agency is of main interest in the field of social robotics as it has been argued that robots could be considered as intentional agents. Factor analyses reveal a four sub-dimensions scale including Sociability, Agency, Animacy, and the Disturbance. We discuss the implication(s) of these dimensions on future perception of and attitudes towards robots.

对（人类）个人如何看待机器人的评估是更好地了解人机交互（HRI）的核心问题。关于这个主题，提出了有希望的建议。但是，目前的工具无法评估参与HRI评估的综合心理维度的足够部分。实际上，所解释的方差百分比通常低于使结构有效的建议阈值。在本文中，我们巩固了从三项不同研究中吸取的教训，并提出了一种拟人化的调查表，该调查表基于拟人化的多成分方法，增加了来自社会心理理论的关于他人的感知以及对人的特征的归因和剥夺的特征：去人性化理论。在这些特征中，在社会机器人领域，代理人的归属是最重要的，因为有人认为机器人可以被视为故意代理。因子分析揭示了四个子维度量表，包括社交能力，代理机构，生气勃勃和干扰。我们讨论了这些维度对未来对机器人的感知和态度的含义。