This article is a response to Josh Reeves's recent book Against Methodology in Science and Religion: Recent Debates on Rationality and Theology that welcomes Reeves's proposal for an anti‐essentialist future for the field of science‐and‐religion, particularly because it has the potential to move the field beyond current, well‐worn methods: the dominance of Christian theology and doctrine, the importance of credibility strategies, and the dependence upon philosophical discourses. Reeves’ proposal has the potential to open the science‐and‐religion field to other topics, problems, and methods, such as studying lived science‐and‐religion. One way of doing this is to study popular culture and its artifacts such as literature, which portrays a co‐mingling of religion and science at the level of day‐to‐day experiences and practices of characters. For at the level of lived experience, religion and science are not well‐defined disciplines neatly compartmentalized into separate academic departments.

中文翻译：

---

为方法论的马赛克创造空间：科学与宗教领域的未来

本文是对乔什·里夫斯（Josh Reeves）的最新著作《科学与宗教中的方法论：理性与神学的最新争论》的回应。这欢迎里夫斯提出的在科学和宗教领域建立反本质主义未来的建议，特别是因为它有潜力将这一领域超越目前陈旧的方法：基督教神学和教义的统治地位，信誉的重要性策略以及对哲学话语的依赖。里夫斯的提议有可能将科学和宗教领域开放给其他主题，问题和方法，例如研究现存的科学和宗教。做到这一点的一种方法是研究流行文化及其文学等文物，这些文学在日常角色体验和实践水平上描绘了宗教与科学的融合。对于实际经验，