Sustainable development aims to address economic, social, and environmental imperatives; yet, in practice, it often embodies a neoliberal market logic that reinforces inequalities. Thus, as the social work profession grapples with its role in advancing environmental sustainability, practice models must explicitly attend to social and economic justice. For example, environmental gentrification refers to situations in which the cleanup of contaminated land or the installation of environmental amenities intentionally or unintentionally catalyzes increased housing costs, thereby contributing to the displacement of vulnerable residents. With the goal of contributing to practice knowledge, we conducted a systematic review of peer‐reviewed articles (1997−2017) to learn how community groups have responded to the threat of environmental gentrification. We found that community organizations employ a range of strategies, including blocking development, negotiating for protections, planning alternatives, and allying with gentrifiers. We conclude by exploring ethical implications and practice principles to help social workers engage in truly sustainable development.

中文翻译：

---

可持续发展中的公平：社区对环境高档化的回应

可持续发展旨在解决经济，社会和环境问题。然而，在实践中，它常常体现出新自由主义的市场逻辑，加剧了不平等现象。因此，随着社会工作界努力解决其在促进环境可持续性方面的作用，实践模式必须明确地遵守社会和经济正义。例如，环境高档化是指有意或无意清理受污染土地或安装环境便利设施，导致住房成本增加，从而导致脆弱居民流离失所的情况。为了促进实践知识的发展，我们对同行评议的文章（1997-2017年）进行了系统的回顾，以了解社区团体如何应对环境高档化的威胁。我们发现社区组织采用了一系列策略，包括阻止开发，就保护进行谈判，计划替代方案以及与绅士结盟。最后，我们探索伦理意义和实践原则，以帮助社会工作者参与真正的可持续发展。